tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-207949472024-03-13T16:16:43.033-05:00A Nerd's Country JournalThe life and times of an atheist geek suddenly transported to a 100-acre Texas ranch.Jeff Heberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13732306951663286466noreply@blogger.comBlogger511125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20794947.post-70843684393894142282007-11-12T14:03:00.000-06:002007-11-12T14:11:05.323-06:00So Long, And Thanks For All The FishI'll not be posting to this blog for the foreseeable future, if ever. I hope you enjoy the archives, accessible over there in the right hand column. I'm particularly proud of the "humor", but I think (hope?) each category has a few worth reading.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.castablasta.com/casta_images/so_long_and_thanks_for_all_the_fish.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px;" src="http://www.castablasta.com/casta_images/so_long_and_thanks_for_all_the_fish.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a>As to why ... well, in a world with millions of blogs on every conceivable subject, I don't think I have anything more of substance to add. This blog has served its purpose, allowing me the chance to improve my writing skills and to work through changing from being a city nerd to a country bumpkin. Now that the adjustment is mostly over, it's time to get on with actually living.<br /><br />All the best and thanks for the support,<br /><br />JeffJeff Heberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13732306951663286466noreply@blogger.com12tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20794947.post-6081893513495279802007-11-06T20:01:00.000-06:002007-11-06T20:13:18.013-06:00RoadnappingI bet this is something you rarely find in the city -- our neighbor kidnapped a road.<br /><br />If you use Google Maps to find our place, it shows Nordic Ridge Road hitting County Road 252. Which is odd, since if you actually <span style="font-style:italic;">drive </span>on CR252, all you see at that supposed intersection is our neighbor's gate. I thought that was strange, until I finally realized that our neighbor simply gated off most of the road and declared it his driveway.<br /><br />I used to think if you nailed something down it couldn't be stolen, but I never figured on how big <span style="font-style:italic;">cajones </span>are in Nerd Country.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_0lES9kQNiWE/RzEfDd-GXfI/AAAAAAAAAzE/sieVHV8_zNE/s1600-h/roadnapping.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_0lES9kQNiWE/RzEfDd-GXfI/AAAAAAAAAzE/sieVHV8_zNE/s400/roadnapping.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5129915594996866546" /></a>Jeff Heberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13732306951663286466noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20794947.post-3883900775992189722007-10-30T08:36:00.001-05:002007-10-30T08:45:26.706-05:00The Department of Too Many Departments DepartmentVia <a href="http://www.theagitator.com/archives/028274.php">Radley Balko</a>, I've just learned that <a href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/5254618.html">the state of Texas</a> has spent 18 months to publish a 668-page report finding that the state of Texas ... issues too many reports.<br /><br />The article doesn't mention if the report came from the Department of Redundancy Department, but it wouldn't surprise me.<br /><br />The best part? Despite the report's finding, its issuers assure their paymasters that continuing to report on the excess of reports is vital:<br /><br /><blockquote>As for the commission's massive report on reports, Heskett predicts it won't go away.<br /><br />"For the report to be effective, it must be ongoing," he said.</blockquote><br /><br />I'm pretty sure that the part of state records administrator Michael Heskett is actually being played by the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Queen%27s_race">Red Queen</a> from Alice in Wonderland, but I'll certainly issue a report once I'm positive.Jeff Heberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13732306951663286466noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20794947.post-82334338668654145092007-10-29T14:24:00.000-05:002007-10-29T14:26:04.195-05:00My Alma Mater and 15 Laterals!My alma mater, Trinity University in San Antonio, made ESPN with a "Top Play" highlight featuring their 61-yard, 15-lateral play at the end of regulation that scored a touchdown and won the game against Millsaps. Pretty amazing stuff, and to think that when I went there we almost never won a game!<br /><br /><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xqAend03p_Q&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xqAend03p_Q&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>Jeff Heberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13732306951663286466noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20794947.post-85255063921556998642007-10-25T10:21:00.000-05:002007-10-25T10:31:28.809-05:00Professional Sports Designer Does GoodMy friend <a href="http://www.hartwellstudioworks.com/">John Hartwell</a> had the rare and incredibly cool privilege yesterday of seeing his designs literally take the field for a real live professional baseball team, as <a href="http://www.al.com/sports/birminghamnews/index.ssf?/base/sports/1193300339222140.xml&coll=2">his new logo debuted in Birmingham for the Double-A Barons</a>. Their <a href="http://www.barons.com/">home page</a> features his new design boldly, which is definitely wise because it kicks ass. Here's the press conference where the new design was introduced, with a poster showing the various elements:<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_0lES9kQNiWE/RyC1Yd-GXcI/AAAAAAAAAyk/a4BbTRsCaiM/s1600-h/barons1.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_0lES9kQNiWE/RyC1Yd-GXcI/AAAAAAAAAyk/a4BbTRsCaiM/s400/barons1.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5125295807914204610" /></a><br /><br />And here are the actual uniforms on actual players. <br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_0lES9kQNiWE/RyC1j9-GXdI/AAAAAAAAAys/QhbQeKRC9KU/s1600-h/barons2.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_0lES9kQNiWE/RyC1j9-GXdI/AAAAAAAAAys/QhbQeKRC9KU/s400/barons2.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5125296005482700242" /></a><br /><br />It's one thing to draw something out on paper, but it's a whole new level of awesome to see what you've created take life for real. My friends and I are all sports fans, and to see something one of us designed take the actual field is just cool beyond words.<br /><br />Congratulations to John and the Birmingham Barons, I hope this is just the first of many sports-related projects to come!Jeff Heberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13732306951663286466noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20794947.post-72488114230628738192007-10-23T07:59:00.001-05:002007-10-23T08:01:05.195-05:00Calvin and Hobbes HalloweenSince I post so many Calvin and Hobbes strips here, I though I should show you this photo of a real-life Halloween version of Calvin's "Snowmen of Horror" displays.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://pics.obra.se/hobased_1866_3114649.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px;" src="http://pics.obra.se/hobased_1866_3114649.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a>Jeff Heberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13732306951663286466noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20794947.post-24165338610009599822007-10-22T19:02:00.001-05:002007-10-22T19:04:50.315-05:00Another FailureGreat, here's yet another way in which my World of Warcraft character is superior to me:<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_0lES9kQNiWE/Rx06RJcDmlI/AAAAAAAAAyU/aYpLDbLaaCc/s1600-h/wow-eating.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_0lES9kQNiWE/Rx06RJcDmlI/AAAAAAAAAyU/aYpLDbLaaCc/s400/wow-eating.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5124316017283275346" /></a><br /><br />If that's not clear, it says "Tip: Your character can eat and drink at the same time." <span style="font-style:italic;">At the same time!</span> I know I can't handle a crossbow like he can, but now <span style="font-style:italic;">this</span>? How many more ways can I be inferior to that stupid digital guy?!Jeff Heberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13732306951663286466noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20794947.post-75834675880853727462007-10-22T17:34:00.000-05:002007-10-22T17:50:16.250-05:00Catholics Against TortureAs <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2007/10/an-orthodox-cat.html">Andrew says</a>, we've heard plenty from the left about why torture is a bad idea, but very little from the right. This post <a href="http://www.markshea.blogspot.com/2007_10_01_archive.html#6425981316666980073">from "Catholic and Enjoying It"</a> is therefore a welcome change, and really made me think about the issue in a new way. Here's a brief excerpt:<br /><br /><blockquote>What lies at the heart of all consequentialist appeals to do grave evil for the greater good is, ultimately, a refusal to trust that God knows what he is talking about. It is the conviction that the Christian revelation is not an insight into the heart of reality, but a sort of idealistic dream that is fun to contemplate in quiet moments and maybe even an "inspiration" in a vague way, but is nonetheless something that hard thinkers and tough-minded men must sweep away when crunch time comes in favor of "realistic" solutions that require us to frankly embrace sin and evil if we hope to live or remain free. In this analysis, the functional belief of the Machiavellian realist is "You shall embrace evil, and evil shall make you free and keep you safe."<br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">The argument of the Christian revelation is that this is, not to put too fine a point on it, a lie from the pit of hell.</span></blockquote><br /><br />I remain confused as to why American Christianity and the Republican party have become synonymous on issues like torture, war, poverty, health care, and race relations. There is ample support for what Americans would consider liberal positions on these problems, and yet it is as if such a thing is unthinkable in the public discourse. <br /><br />If I haven't made it clear on this blog before, I think torture is evil. I think it is wrong. I think it is useless, misguided, dangerous, and corrupting to the torturer. It is to be avoided at nearly all costs, and I am deeply appalled that our nation has joined the despicable ranks of those regimes that routinely employ it. I know there are those among the religious who feel the same way, and I am delighted that finally, at long last, their voices are getting heard.Jeff Heberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13732306951663286466noreply@blogger.com7tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20794947.post-54528793765231634772007-10-09T21:33:00.001-05:002007-10-09T22:22:14.056-05:00Jesus on the River (and I Don't Mean Chris Ferguson)I may not be a Christian, but I just saw a stomach-turning spectacle of blasphemy and hypocrisy on ESPN's first night of coverage of the 2007 World Series of Poker that really offended me.<br /><br /><span id="fullpost">The hand featured seasoned professional Lee Watkinson's A-7 off-suit against poker neophyte and chipleader Jerry Yang's A-9 off-suit. Lee went all in and was called, putting his tournament (and a shot at more than eight million dollars) on the line. <br /><br />Whereupon both parties proceeded to spit on the teachings of Jesus.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.fulltilt-poker-bonus.com/images/watson.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 80px;" src="http://www.fulltilt-poker-bonus.com/images/watson.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a>Watkinson, to his credit, handled it like a pro and was silent throughout the hand, but you can't say the same thing for his fiancée, Timmi deRosa, who jumped up and shouted "No weapon formed against him shall prosper!" If that sounds like a Bible verse, you're right -- it's <a href="http://www.biblestudents.com/htdbv5/htdb0023.htm#Isa54:17">Isaiah 54:17</a>, which is all about God telling Israel how great they're going to have it from there on out. She then followed that up with "Come on, Father! In Jesus' name, No weapon formed against thee shall prosper!" With arms raised above her head, this woman was shouting for God, in Jesus' name, to let her husband win a gambling confrontation so he could bring home millions of dollars.<br /><br /><span style="font-style:italic;">In Jesus' name. </span>Yes, <span style="font-style:italic;">that</span> Jesus, the one who said "If thou wilt be perfect, go sell what thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven." The one who said, "And it came to pass that the beggar died and was carried by the angels into Abraham's bosom. And the rich man also died: and he was buried in Hell." Sounds like a guy anxious to get all his money in pre-flop with the best hand, right?<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.jerryyangpoker.com/images/global/content/our-team/full-tilt-friends/photos/jerry-yang.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px;" src="http://www.jerryyangpoker.com/images/global/content/our-team/full-tilt-friends/photos/jerry-yang.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a>I thought that was fairly appalling, but then Jerry Yang got his turn. "Come on Lord," he said, "you know your purpose for me. Have a purpose for me."<br /><br />Apparently God's purpose for Jerry was to have his opponent dominated with a better kicker for his ace. I didn't know the Almighty went in for bad all-in raises with a Ace-rags, but apparently He does.<br /><br />Not to be outdone, the fiancée again cried out. "Make him a believer! Make Lee a believer, Father!" So apparently Lee's not "of the faith" and this woman thinks that giving him a cash reward will get him to become a Christian. Sort of like a "Bonus Miles" program, I suppose. <br /><br />The irony of having the soul of a non-believer hanging in the balance over a poker game for eight million dollars was lost on all concerned. Apparently poverty is only for those loser Christians who actually, you know, bother reading what Jesus said. Why do I have the feeling this lady is a follower of one or another of the "Prosperity Gospel" cults?<br /><br />Jerry got the last word, though. "Father, in the name of Jesus," he said quietly, voice almost vibrating with intensity, "LET ME WIN!"<br /><br />I'm sure both Jerry and Ms. deRosa are wonderfully nice people. I'm sure they feel quite devoted to their faith, and do what they can to follow the teachings of Christ. But they're both exhibiting the most crass kind of hypocrisy and -- yes, I'll say it -- blasphemy I can imagine. <br /><br />This was the perfect example of that uniquely American abomination that weds greedy materialism with the teachings of Christ. I've seldom seen a case where Las Vegas' nickname of "Sin City" was more appropriate.<br /><br />Look, I don't believe Christ is the Son of God, but I do think he had some incredibly wise teachings. To hear someone, much less <span style="font-style:italic;">two</span> someones, completely distort those teachings to mean their exact opposite really made me angry. It would be like someone invoking Martin Luther King's speeches to justify the shooting of Black people, or Thomas Jefferson's letters to explain why we need to form a theocracy. It's just wrong, and it made me sick.<br /><br />That was a disgraceful display, and both Jerry Yang and Timmi deRosa should be ashamed.</span>Jeff Heberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13732306951663286466noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20794947.post-5868714246246242632007-10-08T20:43:00.000-05:002007-10-08T21:12:39.798-05:00Things I Hate About Chris Berman<img src="http://espn-att.starwave.com/i/columnists/berman_chris_m.jpg" style="float:left;padding-right:5px;">Here is a partial list of the things I hate about ESPN sportscaster Chris Berman. And I'm skipping the obvious things, like his incessant usage of inane nicknames for not only every single player on the planet, but some species of African bush weasels as well.<br /><ol><br /><li>The overly broad gestures that punctuate every single syllable he utters. I fully expect him to knock a colleague unconscious some day with an exaggerated arm swing. Particularly egregious: the "Pseud-OK", the aborted love-child of "I missed it by that much" and Gumby's "O-TAY!".</li><br /><li>The sport jacket with a short-sleeve shirt underneath. What is he, twelve? With every overly broad gesture you see his hairy arms all the way up to his elbows. It is my dream that he will accidentally crush his own larynx during a broadcast while gesticulating, and die for lack of a shirt sleeve with which to stanch the bleeding.</li><br /><li>"BACK BACK BACK BACK BACK BACK BACK ... ((twenty minutes later)) ... BACK BACK BACK BACK ..."</li><br /><li>"WHOOP!", particularly when used at completely inappropriate times. I have visions of this abominable noise issuing forth from a bathroom stall in Bristol about an hour after lunch every day.</li><br /><li>The combover. Let it go, man, because trust me -- it's gone.</li><br /><li>The stupefied look on his face during every NFL Sunday Shoutathon And Screaming Death Match show, when one of his idiotic on-screen comrades finishes speaking and tosses it back to him to move along to the next topic. <span style="font-style:italic;">Pick up the ball, Berman, it's your turn to do something!</span></li><br /><li>He's still on ESPN, and Keith Olbermann is not. There is no justice in the world.</li><br /></ol>Jeff Heberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13732306951663286466noreply@blogger.com8tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20794947.post-88257373725871476262007-10-06T19:38:00.000-05:002007-10-06T20:15:56.625-05:00Near Death ExperienceI almost died Thursday night.<br /><br /><span id="fullpost">I pulled out of the narrow street in the hills overlooking Lake Buchanon at about 11:00. The road was under construction, with two lanes torn down to chunky base rock, though you certainly couldn't see it with the almost-new moon throwing more darkness than light.<br /><br />I was frustrated at having lost at yet another poker session and ready to be home. But there was still a forty minute drive ahead of me and I wanted it over. I spun some gravel as I drove onto the road, punching my little Ranger as fast as it would go. I had it up to sixty within moments, listening to the sound of loose rocks pinging on the undercarriage.<br /><br />As more seconds went by and my sight started adjusting to the darkness surrounding my headlights, the truck started to shake violently.<br /><br />And I realized I was on the wrong half of the road, on the two lanes closed down for construction.<br /><br />The truck skewed violently to the right and I released the gas pedal, trying to pull it back to the left without overcompensating. My mind snapped out of its anger instantly, replacing frustration with one crystal-clear thought:<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">I could die here.</span><br /><br />I remember it so clearly, that thought. The road wound in and out of the Texas hill country limestone, crossing over ravines and surrounded by cedar trees. At that time of night I could have plunged over the side and it would have been hours, at least, before anyone would notice, and that only with a careful search.<br /><br />The truck skewed back to the left and fishtailed, the rear end going one way and the front end the other. In the headlights I could see the small warning placards in front of one of the bridges, just before a major curve.<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">I need to stop this before I hit that bridge, or I'm dead.</span><br /><br />Again the thought stood there alone in my mind, outlined in silver and almost throbbing in its insistence. Press the brakes, but not too violently, pull the steering wheel back in line with the direction of the rear end, don't panic whatever you do. You could die, you could die you could die ...<br /><br />An image of Annie crying hysterically flashed through my mind, me dead along the jumbled rocks of the hill, or plunging into the waters of the lake and drowning, bleeding out into the creek.<br /><br />My entire life did not flash before my eyes. I did not beg for mercy, or in my best Carrie Underwood voice plead for Jesus to take the wheel. I had room for only three things: My death, my wife, and how to stop my truck.<br /><br />I finally shuddered to a halt short of the bridge, breath pounding in and out of my lungs. "Holy shit." I said it aloud. Again. "Holy shit."<br /><br />I put the car in park and just sat there for a moment, until I felt composed enough to pull back onto the road. The <span style="font-style: italic;">finished </span>road, this time.<br /><br />As I drove I thought about what had almost happened to me, how many years I still want to live, how precious existence is, how much I love my wife and my life and how I do not want it to be over.<br /><br />And yet, I thought, not once did I cry out for a higher power. Not once did it even occur to me that a deity might be watching over me, guiding my path, to whom I should beg for mercy.<br /><br />Believers will tell me that regardless, God was watching out for me, and that is why I am here, today, right now, typing this and enjoying the feeling of being alive. For all I know, they're right.<br /><br />What struck me, though, is that I don't even have the instinct for God. I like to think I'm rational and thoughtful and have arrived at my belief system after careful consideration and relentless logic. And I have, in a sense, but I think all of that is a superstructure over what was already there, or already <span style="font-style: italic;">not</span> there, in this case.<br /><br />Whatever belief is, however it's supposed to exist as a part of one's innermost being, I just don't have it. I never have. Exhortations to "just believe" are as wasted on me as "Just see!" is to the blind. I used to think, "I don't believe in God," but the truth is that this isn't a choice. I didn't just decide one day that I don't believe -- it's just not present in me. At all. I couldn't change it any more than I could make myself hear if I were deaf, no matter how great the effort.<br /><br />I say this not as any sort of argument either for or against religion, or faith, or God, or much of anything beyond this:<br /><br />In that moment, when I was sure I could really, truly die, the part of me that exists before rationality reached not for the divine, but for the brake pedal.<br /><br />That's just the way I am built, and if there truly is a merciful God as so many would have me believe, then He is the one who made me this way.<br /><br />I'm glad I am alive, glad I am here to write this, glad that I know, finally, that what I believe is not a bit of sophistry or an angry response or willful defiance, but simply the way I'm put together.<br /><br />I don't have any god-belief present in me, and that's ok. I've got a good life, and more importantly, a good set of brakes. For now, that's enough, and I am content.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&time=&date=&ttype=&q=burnet,+texas&ie=UTF8&ll=30.842552,-98.36493&spn=0.006439,0.014334&t=k&z=17&om=1"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_0lES9kQNiWE/RwgxyJcDmkI/AAAAAAAAAyE/ah12SgPyRkg/s400/neardeath.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5118395714103384642" border="0" /></a><br /></span>Jeff Heberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13732306951663286466noreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20794947.post-5892761469244133392007-10-01T08:25:00.001-05:002007-10-01T09:26:13.743-05:00GoogleCreation?Imagine if every article in "Science" or "Discover" had a blurb on it saying something like "Everything you're reading here is false. Go to this site to see how Scientologists have it right and we're all really alien slaves."<br /><br />Actually I doubt you'd care because, let's face it, like most people you probably don't subscribe to either "Science" or "Discover". But I bet you <span style="font-style:italic;">do </span>read CNN.com or MSNBC.com or FOXNews.com, and that's basically what's happening on those sites, only with Biblical Creationism instead of Scientology.<br /><br />Here's how it works.<br /><br />A big, credible site like CNN.com puts code on their web page articles to serve up ads brokered by Google. Google scans each article as it's delivered to your web browser, does some GoogleMagic, and figures out what the page is about. In <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/09/28/hair.of.mammoth.ap/index.html?iref=mpstoryview">this CNN science article about finding good DNA in mammoth hairs</a>, for instance, it finds great words like DNA, scientists, and biochemistry. "Aha!" thinks Google, "this page is about science and evolution!"<br /><br />Meanwhile, creationists sites out there are also using Google, only they want to <span style="font-style:italic;">buy</span> ads. Their audience is the layperson somewhat interested in science, who they hope to sway to their way of thinking (e.g. the universe is only 6,000 years old, Noah's Flood happened just as described in Genesis, etc.), so they go out and tell Google, "put our ads on any page that has these words in it -- DNA, science, scientists, archaeology, and that sort of thing." <br /><br />GoogleMagic isn't, of course, actually magic; it's just a computer program that tries to match up an article like the one on CNN with an advertiser. The beauty of GoogleAds is that you can be very targeted and only have your ad shown on a page that's probably going to be of interest to your likely customer. If you sell used drill bits, for instance, you probably don't want your ad shown on a page that is about baking cookies.<br /><br />Thus Google sees a CNN article about DNA, and puts up the creationist ads on it. CNN is "The Most Trusted Name in News", so Joe or Jane Average gives credence to what they publish. They're reading an article written by the AP, another trusted source, which contains excellent, scientifically valid information. They get to the bottom of the page, and see <a href="http://www.accuracyingenesis.com/adam.html">ads for sites that seem to also be about evolution</a> and <a href="http://www.evolution.cosmicfingerprints.com/">science</a>, and so they click on it:<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_0lES9kQNiWE/RwD5cpcDmjI/AAAAAAAAAx0/xoJDjTGt1OI/s1600-h/googlecreation.gif"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_0lES9kQNiWE/RwD5cpcDmjI/AAAAAAAAAx0/xoJDjTGt1OI/s400/googlecreation.gif" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5116363447248067122" /></a><br /><br />And <span style="font-style:italic;">voila</span>, the credibility and reliability of CNN and the Associated Press and all those scientists in the original story get carried through to the creationist site.<br /><br />There's nothing immoral or illegal about what the creationists are doing here. They have every right to purchase ad words from Google and to try and reach their target audience. <br /><br />The problem is that they're gaining legitimacy from sources that would otherwise completely undermine everything they say. <br /><br />I'd love to see groups like the <a href="http://www.natcenscied.org/">National Center for Science Education</a> put a small part of their budget to countering this tactic. Bid up those same Google AdWords at a slightly higher price so the creationist ads don't get served. Be aggressive and target other words like "creationism", "bible science", "genesis facts", and more to try and get some well-intentioned but misinformed browsers good, accurate, reliable information about science and history.<br /><br />This isn't about atheism or faith, it's about good science education. You can have a good understanding of real science and still be a Christian, as millions around the world show every day. Having a majority of people in America misunderstand basic scientific concepts is <span style="font-style:italic;">bad</span> for a democratic nation. We can't make good policy or execute sound judgment when our knowledge is built on a foundation of lies.Jeff Heberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13732306951663286466noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20794947.post-57526072708898242352007-09-29T16:10:00.000-05:002007-09-29T16:23:53.405-05:00Watching The WatchmenThis likely won't mean anything to you non-geeks out there, but <a href="http://watchmenmovie.warnerbros.com/">the latest super-hero comic book to be slated for production as a movie is DC's "The Watchmen"</a>, which has my nerd-ometer all a-twitter.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://watchmenmovie.warnerbros.com/poster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px;" src="http://watchmenmovie.warnerbros.com/poster.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a>The original 12-issue mini-series was later collected as a graphic novel, and won Science Fiction's highest honor, the Hugo Award. It was also named by <span style="font-style:italic;">Time </span>Magazine as one of the “100 Best English Language Novels from 1923 to the Present.”<br /><br />I have to admit I'm a little skeptical that this can be turned into a good movie. The original is so dense, you have to read it four or five times before you really catch everything that's going on. It's a complex, multi-layered work of art, with a crazy number of different plot points, complicated characters, and varied levels of meaning. I don't know how well you can translate all of that into one movie. <br /><br />Plus, there's just something fundamentally ... well, silly about people dressing up in costumes and fighting crime. The novel addresses this directly and uses it as a major background theme, and it works as told in a comics format. Dave Gibbons' artwork was the perfect blend of realistic and fantastic. But in a movie, you can't get away from the fact that these are real human beings running around up there in tights.<br /><br />With a franchise like Spider-Man or Superman, it works because they're basically adventure stories. But "The Watchmen" isn't like that. Dare I say it, it's basically a psychological, political thriller. It just happens to feature people in costumes.<br /><br />It's going to be a real challenge to pull off. It certainly has the potential to be a great production, but only if it's done right, with deliberation and insight. The fact that it's being directed by the guy who did "300" doesn't fill me with confidence -- that was about as two dimensional a script as you can get.<br /><br />I'll be watching the movie site with interest as production rolls along. I really, really hope it turns out well. Along with "The Dark Knight", "The Watchmen" was largely responsible for launching the more serious, higher-quality, adult-oriented revival of the comic book industry in the 80's. I'd like to see it do the same for comic-book movies.Jeff Heberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13732306951663286466noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20794947.post-29145190914313897262007-09-25T20:42:00.000-05:002007-09-25T20:52:38.226-05:00Maybe Cingular Should Start With the Goat SacrificingRemember all those times the flight attendant came on and told you to turn off all electronic devices because they might endanger your flight? Apparently <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/09/25/memphis.air.snafu/index.html">they're full of crap</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote>Air traffic controllers were forced to use their personal cell phones to reroute hundreds of flights Tuesday after the Federal Aviation Administration's Memphis Center lost radar and telephone service for more than two hours, snarling air traffic in the middle of the nation.</blockquote><br /><br />That's right, your Razor might crash that Southwest Airlines junket to Vegas, but it's ok for air traffic controllers in Memphis to coordinate all the flights at the entire airport via Cingular Wireless for two hours with no problems.<br /><br />You know, there was a story a while back about <a href="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Nepal_Airlines_performs_goat_sacrifice/articleshow/2337895.cms">Nepal Airlines sacrificing a goat to ensure their one plane made the next flight successfully, </a>and everyone laughed at them. At least, everyone not in Nepal -- you don't want to mock the guys who might be dropping unused goat parts on your head as they fly overhead.<br /><br />But I think our own good-old-fashioned American flight system is no less full of hooey and woo. No electronic devices during takeoff and landing. No liquids allowed on board. Confiscating corkscrews, for goodness' sake. The fact that none of this does any good at all makes no difference. <br /><br />I think next time I fly I'm going to use a cooler full of <span style="font-style:italic;">cabrito</span> as one of my carry-on items. It ought to do about as much good as most of the other "safety measures" we're subjected to, and unlike cell phones, it makes for a great taco.Jeff Heberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13732306951663286466noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20794947.post-86904473402989165482007-09-21T07:22:00.000-05:002007-09-21T07:28:36.489-05:00Ride the Slut!The Seattle neighborhood of South Lake Union <a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/332081_slut18.html">has a new trolley</a>, which means it's the South Lake Union Trolley. Or "SLUT" for short. An enterprising store in the area already has shirts for sale reading "Ride the SLUT!" which are selling like mad. No word yet on whether they'll also be staging a production of "A Streetcar Named Desire".<br /><br />I might have to plan a trip to Seattle. It's been far too long since I experienced the high-speed thrill of riding a slut.<br /><br />P.S. I'll be out of town till Sunday at my nephew's wedding in Houston. How to differentiate this interval from my normal glacial posting place is an exercise left to the reader.Jeff Heberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13732306951663286466noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20794947.post-91482619322095172902007-09-17T16:15:00.000-05:002007-09-17T16:29:13.634-05:00The Wheel of Time Stops Turning<div class="captions"><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_0lES9kQNiWE/Ru7w7Cby_SI/AAAAAAAAAwo/x_WFDKQJUMI/s1600-h/03jordan_270x360.jpg"><img style="margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_0lES9kQNiWE/Ru7w7Cby_SI/AAAAAAAAAwo/x_WFDKQJUMI/s320/03jordan_270x360.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5111287524168498466" /></a><br><a href="http://www.locusmag.com/2006/Issues/03Jordan.html">Photo by Liza Trombi</a></div><br /><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20824649/">Fantasy novelist James Oliver Rigney Jr. (aka Robert Jordan), author of the massively popular "Wheel of Time" series, died today in Charleston, South Carolina</a>, of complications from primary amyloidosis with cardiomyopathy, according to MSNBC.com.<br /><br />Having read most of his fantasy series and a number of personal posts Mr. Jordan has made available online, he seemed to be a good man and certainly his writing brought joy to millions around the world. I think it's fair to say that he was a major figure in the genre and that his death will have a serious impact on the sci-fi/fantasy publishing industry.<br /><br />My feelings about the books themselves are more mixed. I enjoyed the series at first, but after the first three books it seemed to grow heavy under the burden of its own seriousness. Events that could have taken place in a chapter were stretched out over several thousand pages. Too many characters plagued the plot, without seeming to advance the story at all. The same plot points kept coming up over and over to the same characters, and for a while there it seemed like literally nothing had happened over the course of three books.<br /><br />Ultimately, I'd have to say the series was a victim of its own success. When an author (or musician or athlete or director or what have you) gets too big, everyone starts being afraid to tell them "no". They're given license to do whatever they like and no one has the courage to actually edit them, to say "Gosh, Bob, this sucks." <br /><br />And I think that's too bad. Because clearly these guys have some talent, or they wouldn't have been successful in the first place.<br /><br />In a way, we betray people like Mr. Jordan when we become too intimidated to express our opinions honestly, when no one will tell them what's good and what's bad become overshadowed by expectation and hubris. <br /><br />I do feel saddened by the loss of Robert Jordan, even if my opinion of "The Wheel of Time" have become negative over the years. He worked hard, he treated the genre with respect, and he inspired thousands of people with his words. That's an impressive legacy for anyone to claim.Jeff Heberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13732306951663286466noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20794947.post-6324554076963057022007-09-15T08:17:00.000-05:002007-09-15T08:18:32.460-05:00Better Iron Man TrailerI posted a bad, user-shot Iron Man trailer a while back. T<a href="http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount/ironman/">he official version of it is now available, though, so go check it out!</a> This actually looks like a pretty good movie, I'll definitely be going to see it.Jeff Heberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13732306951663286466noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20794947.post-21235488023470961572007-09-12T08:33:00.000-05:002007-09-12T08:39:58.743-05:00Good AdviceBoth of the two best pieces of advice I've ever gotten came from my brother Joey. To wit:<br /><br /><blockquote>The opinions of worthless people are worthless.</blockquote><br /><br />And:<br /><br /><blockquote>Marriage isn't fifty-fifty. It's one hundred-one hundred.</blockquote><br /><br />When my father and mother split up and Dad moved to Lake Charles for a while (before they got back together then split up again and got back together again and ... ), Joey was pretty much the man of the house. He took great care of us all. I remember that time as one of the few stretches where the house felt at peace, where I wasn't always walking on eggshells and waiting for the next explosion.<br /><br />That didn't last, of course, but the simple and profound lessons my brother taught us did. Take care of your family. Shed the worthless opinions of those unworthy of judging you. Give it everything you've got. <br /><br />It's the basic stuff that endures. I know it wasn't easy for him to take up the burden of responsibility at his age, but he did it and did it well.<br /><br />So I want to say thank you to Joey, and to all those like him who carry the rest of us forward. You give it a hundred percent and inspire us to do the same. I hope we don't fail you.Jeff Heberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13732306951663286466noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20794947.post-51588551514905758922007-09-11T09:03:00.000-05:002007-09-11T09:04:20.605-05:00UnderoosI am 38 years old and am currently wearing Spider-Man underwear.<br /><br />It's a good thing I'm already married, because there's no <span style="font-style:italic;">way</span> I'm date-able material.Jeff Heberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13732306951663286466noreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20794947.post-75988815227692117922007-09-07T21:17:00.001-05:002007-09-07T21:22:12.915-05:00SilenceI haven't been posting lately because I'm looking into some health issues (both physical and mental) and haven't been in the right frame of mind to interact with anyone, much less write anything. I hope that the cycle will swing back into a better place in the next few days, and I'll be settled enough to open up again. <br /><br />I find it annoying how much we are at the mercy of our biology. Isn't it time we invented robots into which we can upload our personalities and minds already? Someone needs to get on the ball.<br /><br />I say, until we have immortal, indestructible, incorruptible robot surrogate bodies and FLYING CARS ALREADY!!, we just give the finger to the entire technological complex.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.insanesoccer.com/games/images/thefinger.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px;" src="http://www.insanesoccer.com/games/images/thefinger.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a>Jeff Heberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13732306951663286466noreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20794947.post-27897929437289101252007-09-02T08:30:00.000-05:002007-09-02T00:33:28.940-05:00Carnival of the Godless RedirectBetween the time I volunteered to host "The Carnival of the Godless #74" and now, I had decided to move the atheist content of Nerd Country to my other (new) site, "Atheist FAQs". So those of you coming here for <a href="http://www.atheistfaq.com/2007/09/carnival-of-godless-74-pulp-edition.html">the latest edition of The Carnival of the Godless, it can be found right now, hot off the Internet presses, at AtheistFAQ.com!</a><br /><br />Anyone else who doesn't know what a "Carnival of the Godless" is, or who wants to know why it's not actually at this address today as advertised, read more below. Otherwise, <a href="http://www.atheistfaq.com/2007/09/carnival-of-godless-74-pulp-edition.html">get thee to the Carnival, post-haste</a>!<br /><br /><span id="fullpost">First off, I should warn you that I chose to assemble and present the Carnival as if it were from a 1930's era "Doc Savage" type of supernatural pulp adventure novel. I hope you don't find it too distracting, and that the links are still easy enough to navigate. It was a hoot putting it together like that.<br /><br />For my two regular readers, a Blog Carnival is a "Best of the Week" type of collection that gathers good blog posts from around the Internet on a particular theme, putting them all in one place so those interested in that topic have a good set of links to visit. This particular Carnival is about issues of interest to atheists, hence the name "Carnival of the Godless". There are lots of other Carnivals out there, like the <a href="http://nehring.blogspot.com/2007/08/carnival-of-cinema-episode-xxxxv.html">Carnival of Cinema</a>, <a href="http://theworldimho.blogspot.com/2007/08/catholic-carnival-134.html">The Catholic Carnival</a>, or <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/aardvarchaeology/2007/08/skeptics_circle_68.php">The Skeptics' Circle</a> just to name a few. <br /><br />You should be warned that some of the blog entries featured in the Carnival of the Godless (CotG) are pretty hostile to religion and religious adherents. Such is the nature of the world; I prefer to be more non-confrontational, but I don't think it's a bad thing sometimes for people to get in each others' faces, either. I have a different style, but the other way can work, and work very well, also. To each their own.<br /><br />All that's by way of saying that if you're a theist, there are a few posts in the CotG this time around that might piss you off. So be warned.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.atheistfaq.com/2007/09/carnival-of-godless-74-pulp-edition.html">One more time, Carnival of the Godless #74 is now available on AtheistFAQ.com.</a></span>Jeff Heberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13732306951663286466noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20794947.post-35726980895502069782007-08-30T07:40:00.000-05:002007-08-30T07:50:06.814-05:00Texas Constitution Bans Atheists From OfficeDid you know that it is unconstitutional for me to hold a public office in the state of Texas? <a href="http://tlo2.tlc.state.tx.us/txconst/sections/cn000100-000400.html">Article 1, Section 4 of the Texas Constitution states</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote>No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office, or public trust, in this State; nor shall any one be excluded from holding office on account of his religious sentiments, <span style="font-weight:bold;">provided he acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being.</span></blockquote><br /><br />Not that I was planning on running for Governor any time soon, but still, I'd have liked to think that I could in theory give something back to my state in the form of public service.<br /><br />Guess not.<br /><br />This is the kind of thing that made me "come out". Prejudice against people without a belief in god is enshrined in the actual constitution of the state I inhabit.<br /><br />Think about that for a moment. <br /><br />A child molester could hold office here. Or an admitted terrorist. Or a serial murderer. All of them are in theory qualified to hold the public trust, as long as they were Catholic, or Southern Baptist, or Hindu, or what have you.<br /><br />But not me.<br /><br />P.S. I better stay the hell out of <a href="http://www.sos.arkansas.gov/ar-constitution/arcart19/arcart19-1.htm">Arkansas</a>, <a href="http://www.scstatehouse.net/scconstitution/a06.htm">South Carolina</a>, and <a href="http://www.tncrimlaw.com/law/constit/IX.html#2">Tennessee</a>, too.<br /><br /><span style="font-style:italic;">(Hat tip to <a href="http://menstrualpoetry.com/">Holly Orr</a> for the link.)</span>Jeff Heberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13732306951663286466noreply@blogger.com9tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20794947.post-59825479861161204982007-08-27T20:37:00.000-05:002007-08-27T20:53:15.724-05:00Senatorial Bathroom Power StanceAt the risk of turning this into a potty-themed blog, I just can't let <a href="http://www.rollcall.com/issues/1_1/breakingnews/19763-1.html">this story</a> about US Senator Larry Craig's (R-Idaho) arrest for lewd behavior in an airport restroom go without comment:<br /><br /><blockquote>Craig stated "that he has a wide stance when going to the bathroom and that his foot may have touched mine," the report states. Craig also told the arresting officer that he reached down with his right hand to pick up a piece of paper that was on the floor.</blockquote><br /><br />I've been in a number of public restroom stalls in my 38 years, but I can't ever recall being in such dire gastric distress that I would need to take a stance while seated so wide that my foot was at any risk of touching the foot of the gentleman in the next stall. All I can say is, if you need to take a stance that wide, you'd better be in the handicapped stall, because you're going to need to grip those handlebars for leverage.<br /><br />What really disturbs me is that you have to touch feet to signal you want to do something naughty. Frankly, I think foot-on-foot intimate contact is just wrong, and ought to be illegal pretty much anywhere. If feet weren't meant to be gross, they'd not have evolved to be waaaaaaay down there at the opposite end of our bodies from all our sense organs. They're stuck on the end of the legs for a reason -- they're nasty! <br /><br />On a more serious note, I have a hard time understanding what was illegal about this episode. He didn't actually solicit any sort of illegal contact, he just exhibited some behaviors typical of people who would. And though as I noted, he lied about why he did those things -- the grip and the "I was just picking up a piece of paper" -- that's all after the fact. It seems like you'd have to prove he intended to solicit illegal behavior, and I don't see how you could do that in this case.<br /><br />I understand the desire to keep lewd acts out of public restrooms, but honestly, this seems to be a pretty outrageous law. By comparison, you can't arrest a guy just for driving around slowly in an area known for prostitution. You have to see them actually solicit the illegal act -- just acting suspicious isn't (and shouldn't) be enough.Jeff Heberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13732306951663286466noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20794947.post-79936373311013344362007-08-25T09:16:00.000-05:002007-08-25T09:34:03.837-05:00Politically Incorrect RestaurantsSomething about the Tex-Mex restaurant that just opened in Bertram makes me uncomfortable. I think it's the name:<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_0lES9kQNiWE/RtA7LQK_3GI/AAAAAAAAAvU/QPo-mtJz4TA/s1600-h/mezkans.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_0lES9kQNiWE/RtA7LQK_3GI/AAAAAAAAAvU/QPo-mtJz4TA/s400/mezkans.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5102643442316467298" /></a><br /><br />Yes, you're reading that right, it's "Los Mezkan's", which for you non-Spanish speakers out there means "The Mexican's". Wait, I'm getting a cable from the Mexican embassy -- ok, that's not really Spanish, it's just slang. Hmph.<br /><br />Anyway, I know calling someone "Mezkan" isn't really an insult, but it still seems weird. It'd be like opening a place that serves traditional "white people" food and calling it "Cracker's" or something.<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_0lES9kQNiWE/RtA71wK_3HI/AAAAAAAAAvc/Fj_f8vwtO_Q/s1600-h/5775cracker-barrel.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_0lES9kQNiWE/RtA71wK_3HI/AAAAAAAAAvc/Fj_f8vwtO_Q/s400/5775cracker-barrel.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5102644172460907634" /></a><br /><br />Oh. Well. Bad example. But you'd never see a restaurant whose name could be construed as an insulting term for Black people, right? Right?!<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_0lES9kQNiWE/RtA8iwK_3II/AAAAAAAAAvk/S3knjS6qj0Q/s1600-h/sambos.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_0lES9kQNiWE/RtA8iwK_3II/AAAAAAAAAvk/S3knjS6qj0Q/s400/sambos.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5102644945555020930" /></a><br /><br />I give up. Maybe we're normal here in Bertram after all.Jeff Heberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13732306951663286466noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20794947.post-45742200508952805342007-08-23T23:57:00.001-05:002007-08-24T00:16:14.550-05:00Bloggers as ReportersAs <a href="http://www.blogofages.net">my father-in-law George Phenix </a>said at our wedding, Annie and I both have "ink in our blood" as children of newspaper publishers. So even though this blog is mostly for yuks, I take journalism seriously. That's why I want to point you to <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oew-rosen22aug22,0,4771551.story">this excellent LA Times article</a> by Jay Rosen about specific examples of bloggers doing the same real, honest, hard, valuable work that historically made journalism so important to our democracy. <br /><br /><span id="fullpost">Journalists are, at their core, supposed to be adversarial. They're supposed to go out and find the truth, even -- especially! -- when that truth offends those who hold power. Whether it's the local dog catcher abusing his authority to harm animals or the President of the United States lying through his teeth about blowjobs or WMD, reporters are supposed to be the guardians of truth in a democracy.<br /><br />And yet, reporters at some point gained the mantle of royalty, holding a privileged and exalted position in our culture. We put them on pedestals and made stars out of them. They have become entrenched in the halls of power on which they are supposed to report, and I think something valuable in the profession was lost when that happened. <br /><br />Making them stars subverts that adversarial positioning they're supposed to have. When our elite political reporters, for instance, hang out at cocktail parties with the politicians they're supposed to be covering, that's a problem. <br /><br />Over the last ten years, bloggers have begun to fill the void vacated when our journalists became news readers instead of reporters, when they became part of the story rather than investigators of it. And yet most people think of blogging as being a series of high school slam books or open diaries, full of pointless trivia at best and the worst sort of vituperative bile at its worst. In any event, blogging certainly can't fill the same kind of niche that good reporting is supposed to. Right?<br /><br />Wrong.<br /><br />As Rosen points out, bloggers at their best can exceed even the best traditional journalism has been able to offer. They don't have the billion dollar budgets or massive news organization, but they have drive and a dogged determination to follow a story to the nitty gritty end, no matter where it leads. <br /><br />I'm not saying blogging and bloggers will, can, or should replace traditional news agencies. But they absolutely can -- and already have, as Rosen points out -- do at least as well as any professional media outlet. Already they have helped remind our reporters what their job is supposed to be -- to uncover the truth, not parrot talking point memos. <br /><br />This blog is just for yuks as I said, but others are much, much more serious. Before you casually dismiss all blogging as overhyped nonsense, remember that television news once got the same dismissive treatment from their print brethren. Then "The News Went Live" and nothing was ever the same again. I think we're in the middle of another such revolution, and bloggers are leading the charge.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oew-rosen22aug22,0,4771551.story">Check out Rosen's piece</a>. I think it'll really open your eyes to what's possible in the collaborative, interactive world the Internet and blogging software have made possible. Journalism isn't something you learn in an ivory tower, and "Reporter" isn't a title bequeathed by a royal elite. Journalism is what you <span style="font-style:italic;">do</span>, and today, bloggers are doing it better than almost anyone else.</span>Jeff Heberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13732306951663286466noreply@blogger.com2